Case Details

Decision Information

Visa, MasterCard - CT-2010-010

Collection	Case Details
Date Filed	2010-12-15
Panel Members	Phelan J.; Dr. Wiktor Askanas; Mr. Montgomery
File Number	CT-2010-010
Status	Decided
Type of Application	Price Maintenance
Section(s) of the Competition Act	s. 76
Hearing Date	2012-05-08 to 2012-05-10 2012-05-14 to 2012-05-17 2012-05-22 to 2012-05-25 2012-05-28 to 2012-06-01 2012-06-04 to 2012-06-07 2012-06-18 to 2012-06-21
Date Completed	2013-07-23

Decision Content

NOTE: Some of the documents on this web page have been provided by external sources and have been inserted, as received, in the language and format of record.
Questions or comments may be sent by e-mail to: tribunal@ct-tc.gc.ca

CT-2010-010 ( Visa, MasterCard )

Proceeding 1 The Commissioner of Competition v Visa Canada Corporation and MasterCard International Incorporated et al
Section(s):	76 - Price Maintenance
Filed on:	2010-12-15
Status:	Decided - 2013-07-23

Applicant(s):

The Commissioner of Competition

Respondent(s):

Visa Canada Corporation

MasterCard International Incorporated

Intervenor(s):

The Toronto-Dominion Bank

Canadian Bankers Association

Hearing Date:

2012-05-08 to 2012-05-10

2012-05-14 to 2012-05-17

2012-05-22 to 2012-05-25

2012-05-28 to 2012-06-01

2012-06-04 to 2012-06-07

2012-06-18 to 2012-06-21

Hearing Location:

Ottawa

Panel Members:

Phelan J.

Dr. Wiktor Askanas

Mr. Keith Montgomery

Case Documents

Pleading(s)

Pleading(s)
#	Title	Date
1	Notice of Application pursuant to section 76 of the Competition Act - Price Maintenance	2010-12-15
10	Response of Visa Canada Corporation	2011-01-31
11	Response of MasterCard International Incorporated	2011-01-31
16	Affidavit of Darren Hannah	2011-02-10
20	Affidavit of Jim Sallas and Jeff Van Duynhoven	2011-02-10
25	Reply of the Commissioner of Competition	2011-02-14
299	Closing argument of the Canadian Bankers Association	2012-06-28
300	Closing argument of Mastercard International Inc.	2012-06-29
302	Closing argument of Visa Canada Inc.	2012-06-29
303	Closing argument of the Commissioner of Competition	2012-07-05
304	Closing argument of the Toronto-Dominion Bank	2012-07-23

Pleading(s)
Motion(s) and Related Document(s)

Other(s)
#	Title	Date
15	Request for leave to intervene on behalf of the Canadian Bankers Association	2011-02-10
19	Motion for leave to intervene of the Toronto-Dominion Bank	2011-02-10
27	Response of Visa Canada Corporation to the motion to Intervene of the Toronto-Dominion Bank	2011-02-23
29	Response of Visa Canada Corporation to the motion to intervene of the Canadian Bankers Association	2011-02-23
31	Response of Mastercard International Incorporated to the motion for leave to intervene of Canadian Bankers Association	2011-02-24
33	Response of Mastercard International Incorporated to the motion to intervene of the Toronto-Dominion Bank	2011-02-24
35	Response of the Commissioner to motions to intervene	2011-02-24
40	Reply from the Toronto-Dominion Bank to the response of the Commissioner of Competition concerning the motion for leave to intervene	2011-03-03
43	Reply from the Canadian Bankers Association to the response of the Commissioner of Competition concerning the motion to intervene	2011-03-03

Pleading(s)
Other(s)

Other(s)
#	Title	Date
223	Witness statement of Graig Daigle	2012-03-06
228	Witness statement of Marion Van Impe	2012-03-06
234	Witness statement of Mario De Armas	2012-03-06
224	Witness statement of Tim Broughton	2012-03-07
226	Witness statement of Candice Li	2012-03-07
227	Witness statement of Pierre Houle	2012-03-07
230	Witness statement of Paul Jewer	2012-03-07
225	Witness statement of Michael Shirley	2012-03-08
229	Witness statement of Charles Symons	2012-03-13
255	Witness statement of Jordan Cohen	2012-04-04
205	Witness statement of Karen Leggett	2012-04-05
206	Witness statement of Robert Livingston	2012-04-10
233	Witness statement of Jeff Van Duynhoven	2012-04-10
236	Witness statement of Chris Hewitt	2012-04-10
242	Witness statement of Elizabeth Buse	2012-04-10
243	Witness statement of William Sheedy	2012-04-10
244	Witness statement of Brian Weiner	2012-04-10
253	Witness statement of Betty K. Devita	2012-04-10
256	Witness statement of Kevin J. Stanton	2012-05-03
267	Expert report of Douglas Swansson	2012-03-08
246	Expert report of Alan S. Frankel Ph.D.	2012-03-09
245	Expert report of Dennis Carlton	2012-03-14
251	Expert report of Ralph A. Winter	2012-03-12
247	Expert report of Mike McCormack	2012-03-14
238	Expert report of Benoît Gauthier	2012-04-09
231	Expert report of Balaji Jairam	2012-04-10
239	Expert report of Jeffrey Church	2012-04-10
240	Expert report of Kenneth G. Elzinga	2012-04-10
241	Expert report of Michael Mulvey	2012-04-10
254	Expert report of Peter T. Dunn	2012-04-10
248	Expert report of Michael A. Kemp	2012-04-23
249	Expert report of Mike McCormack in reply	2012-04-23
250	Expert report of Ralph A. Winter in reply	2012-04-23
252	Expert report of Alan S. Frankel in reply	2012-04-23

Decision(s)

Decision(s)
#	Title	Date
50	Reasons and Order regarding motions for leave to intervene by the Toronto-Dominion Bank and the Canadian Bankers Association	2011-04-05
52	Scheduling Order	2011-04-07
56	Order creating a revised Scheduling Order	2011-08-26
86	Order regarding the motions to be heard on October 4, 2011	2011-09-30
100	Confidentiality Order	2011-10-05
104	Order regarding the production of documents by MasterCard International Incorporated	2011-10-07
108	Reasons and Order regarding the Commissioner's motion dealing with the redaction of information from TD Bank's productions and its refusal to produce certain documents	2011-10-12
158	Order regarding motions arising from the examinations for discovery	2012-01-24
159	Order creating a re-revised Scheduling Order	2012-01-24
164	Order creating an amended Scheduling Order	2012-02-08
167	Order creating an amended Scheduling Order	2012-03-07
317	Summary of the confidential decision	2013-07-23
337	Reasons for Order and Order dismissing the Commissioner's application	2013-07-23
336	Reasons for decision and decision	2013-09-09

You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.

Do not display this message anymore