Case Details

Decision Information

London Drugs v. Givenchy - CT-2007-002

Collection Case Details
Date Filed 2007-03-09
Panel Members Simpson J.
File Number CT-2007-002
Status Withdrawn
Type of Application Leave to Make Application under Sections 75, 76, 77 or 79
Section(s) of the Competition Act s. 103.1
Hearing Date NA
Date Completed 2007-05-07

Decision Content

NOTE: Some of the documents on this web page have been provided by external sources and have been inserted, as received, in the language and format of record.
Questions or comments may be sent by e-mail to: tribunal@ct-tc.gc.ca

 

CT-2007-002 ( London Drugs v Givenchy )

 

Proceeding 1

London Drugs Limited v. Parfums Givenchy Canada Ltd.

Section(s):

103.1 - Leave to make application under section 75, 76 or 77

Filed on:

2007-03-09

Status:

Withdrawn

 

Applicant(s):

London Drugs Limited

Respondent(s):

Parfums Givenchy Canada Ltd.

 

Panel Members:

Simpson J.

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

#

Title

Date

1

Notice of Application for leave pursuant to section 103.1 of the Competition Act

2007-03-13

2

Notice of Application pursuant to section 75 of the Competition Act

2007-03-09

3

Notice of Application for interim Order pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act

2007-03-09

5

Statement of grounds and material facts

2007-03-09

6

Written representations of the Applicant in support of the s.103 application for leave

2007-03-09

8

Letter of R.J. Taylor dated March 16, 2007 confirming that this matter is not or has not been the object of an inquiry by the Commissioner of Competition

2007-03-16

28

Affidavit of Jeanie Lee, sworn March 9, 2007

2007-05-07

29

Notice of withdrawal of application

2007-05-07

31

Representations of the Respondent in response to an application for leave pursuant to section 103.1

2007-05-11

 

Other(s)

 

#

Title

Date

7

Letter requesting a teleconference to address some issues

2007-03-09

 

Decision(s)

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.