Case Details

Decision Information

Broadview-Wyeth - CT-2004-005

Collection Case Details
Date Filed 2004-05-13
Panel Members Blais J.
File Number CT-2004-005
Status Decided
Type of Application Leave to Make Application under Sections 75, 76, 77 or 79
Refusal to Deal
Section(s) of the Competition Act s. 103.1; s. 75
Hearing Date n/a
Date Completed 2004-09-20

Decision Content

NOTE: Some of the documents on this web page have been provided by external sources and have been inserted, as received, in the language and format of record.
Questions or comments may be sent by e-mail to: tribunal@ct-tc.gc.ca

 

CT-2004-005 ( Broadview-Wyeth )

 

Proceeding 1

1177057 Ontario Inc. c.o.b. as Broadview Pharmacy v Wyeth Canada Inc.

Section(s):

103.1 - Leave to make application under section 75, 76 or 77

75 - Refusal to deal

Filed on:

2004-05-13

Status:

Decided - 2004-09-20

 

Applicant(s):

1177057 Ontario Inc. c.o.b. as Broadview Pharmacy

Respondent(s):

Wyeth Canada Inc.

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

#

Title

Date

1a

Application for leave pursuant to s. 103.1 to make application (includes statement of grounds and material facts)

2004-05-13

1b

Affidavit of H. Cohen dated May 10, 2004

2004-05-13

2

Application under section 75 of the Competition Act

2004-05-13

3

Letter of A. Lafond dated May 17, 2004 confirming that this matter is not or has not been the object of an inquiry by the Commissioner of Competition

2004-05-18

4

Notice pursuant to section 103.1(5) of the Competition Act

2004-05-25

5a

Written representations in response to the request for leave to file an application

2004-06-10

5b

Affidavit of Terri Power sworn June 9, 2004 in support of the written representations of the Respondent

2004-06-10

6

Letter renewing and clarifying the request for an oral hearing be held prior to the determination of this matter

2004-07-16

7

Letter in response to the letter requesting an oral hearing

2004-07-20

 

Decision(s)

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.