Case Details

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOTE: Some of the documents on this web page have been provided by external sources and have been inserted, as received, in the language and format of record.
Questions or comments may be sent by e-mail to:
tribunal@ct-tc.gc.ca

 

CT-2002-001 ( United Grain (2002) )

 

Proceeding 1

The Commissioner of Competition v United Grain Growers Limited

Section(s):

92 – Merger

104 (92) Interim Order (Mergers)

Filed on:

2002-01-02

Status:

Decided - 2002-10-17

 

Applicant(s):

The Commissioner of Competition

Respondent(s):

United Grain Growers Limited

Intervenor(s):

Canadian Wheat Board

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

 

Decision(s)

 

#

Title

Date

5

Interim consent Order

2002-01-14

13

Order extending the time for filing the affidavits of documents

2002-02-28

29

Interim confidentiality (protective) Order

2002-05-27

31

Reasons and Order granting request for leave to intervene

2002-05-29

32

Reasons and Order denying request for leave to intervene

2002-05-29

33

Reasons and Order denying request for leave to intervene

2002-05-29

34

Scheduling Order

2002-05-29

48

Reasons and Order regarding confidentiality, scheduling and retainer of Commissioner's expert witness

2002-07-10

58

Order amending Scheduling Order

2002-08-12

68

Order amending the amended Scheduling Order dated August 12, 2002

2002-09-04

71b

Findings and determinations of the Competition Tribunal pursuant to section 92 of the Competition Act

2002-09-06

74

Findings and determinations of the Competition Tribunal pursuant to section 92 of the Competition Act

2002-09-10

84

Reasons and Order regarding issues considered at pre-hearing conference on August 9, 2002

2002-09-27

85b

Reasons and Order regarding disclosure of will-say statements

2002-10-02

97

Reasons and Order regarding disclosure of will-say statements upon Commissioner's further application

2002-10-07

104b

Reasons and Order regarding Commissioner's refusals

2002-10-17

 

Proceeding 2

The Commissioner of Competition v United Grain Growers

Section(s):

105 (92) - Registered consent agreement (Mergers)

Filed on:

2006-08-30

Status:

Decided

 

Applicant(s):

The Commissioner of Competition

Respondent(s):

United Grain Growers Limited

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

#

Title

Date

105a

Registered Consent Agreement

2002-10-17

 

Motion(s) and Related Document(s)

 

#

Title

Date

190

Notice of motion on behalf of Commissioner

2006-08-30

191a

Commissioner of Competition's memorandum of argument motion for show cause hearing and relief

2006-08-30

192a

Affidavit of Terence Stechysin

2006-08-30

193a

Notice of motion on behalf of Respondent for Directions/Orders

2006-08-30

 

Decision(s)

 

 

 

 

Proceeding 3

United Grain Growers Limited v The Commissioner of Competition

Section(s):

106 (92) - Rescission or variation of consent agreement or order (Mergers)

Filed on:

2005-08-12

Status:

Withdrawn 2006-05-11

 

Applicant(s):

United Grain Growers Limited

Respondent(s):

The Commissioner of Competition

Intervenor(s):

Canadian Wheat Board Mission Terminal Inc.

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

 

Motion(s) and Related Document(s)

 

#

Title

Date

112f

Notice of motion for interim relief

2005-08-22

112g

Memorandum of argument concerning motion for interim relief

2005-08-22

112h

Affidavit of Stanley Murdoch Mackay sworn August 11, 2005 regarding the motion for interim relief

2005-08-22

132e

Reply regarding the motion for interim relief (public version)

2005-10-20

128d

Memorandum of argument in response concerning the motion for interim relief - public version

2005-10-24

128e

Affidavit in response concerning motion for interim relief of David Ouellet sworn on September 9, 2005 - public version

2005-10-24

 

Other(s)

 

#

Title

Date

112i

Statement of grounds and material facts - public version

2005-08-22

125a

Request for leave to intervene by the Canadian Wheat Board

2005-09-07

126

Response to request for leave to intervene

2005-09-09

127

Response to request for leave to intervene

2005-09-12

129

Reply to request for leave to intervene

2005-09-12

135a

Request for leave to intervene of Mission Terminal Inc.

2005-09-26

139

Response to request for leave to intervene by Mission Terminal Inc.

2005-10-11

159b

Expert affidavit of Alan Martyszenko sworn January 17, 2006 (expert report dated December 23, 2005)

2006-02-24

159d

Expert rebuttal affidavit of Alan Martyszenko sworn February 27, 2006 (expert report dated February 24, 2006)

2006-02-24

160b

Expert affidavit of Roger Ware sworn January 11, 2006 (expert report dated December 23, 2005)

2006-02-24

160d

Expert rebuttal affidavit of Roger Ware sworn February 24, 2006

2006-02-24

162b

Expert affidavit of Dr. Ralph Winter sworn January 27, 2006

2006-02-27

 

Decision(s)

 

#

Title

Date

116

Direction to counsel concerning October 3, 2005 hearing of motion for interim relief at 10 a.m. in Ottawa

2005-08-22

123

Direction regarding the proper procedural track for the section 106 application

2005-09-02

124

Direction concerning the Canadian Wheat Board intervenor status

2005-09-02

130

Direction concerning potential intervention of the CWB

2005-09-12

140

Consent Scheduling Order in section 106 application

2005-10-14

142

Reasons and Order granting request for leave to intervene to the Canadian Wheat Board

2005-11-04

143

Reasons and Order granting request for leave to intervene to Mission Terminal Inc.

2005-11-04

150

Order amending Scheduling Order dated October 14, 2005

2005-12-08

158

Interim confidentiality Order - on consent of all parties and intervenors

2006-02-16

167

Order relating to matters considered at the case management conference of March 17, 2006

2006-03-20

184

Order dismissing Commissioner’s motion for summary disposition

2006-04-21

187

Reasons and Order regarding UGG's motion to adjourn its application and, in the alternative, for leave to discontinue without costs

2006-05-10

188

Reasons for Order dismissing Commissioner's motion for summary disposition

2006-05-10

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.