Case Details

Decision Information

Canadian Waste - CT-2000-002

Collection Case Details
Date Filed 2000-04-26
Panel Members McKeown J.; L.P. Schwartz; G. Solursh
File Number CT-2000-002
Status Decided
Type of Application Interim Order (Mergers)
Mergers
Section(s) of the Competition Act s. 92; ss.104 (92)
Hearing Date 2001-06-20 to 2001-06-22
Date Completed 2001-10-03

Decision Content

NOTE: Some of the documents on this web page have been provided by external sources and have been inserted, as received, in the language and format of record.
Questions or comments may be sent by e-mail to: tribunal@ct-tc.gc.ca

 

CT-2000-002 ( Canadian Waste )

 

Proceeding 1

The Commissioner of Competition v Canadian Waste Services Holdings Inc.

Section(s):

92 – Mergers

104 (92) – Interim Order (Mergers)

Filed on:

2000-04-26

Status:

Decided - 2001-10-03

 

Applicant(s):

The Commissioner of Competition

Respondent(s):

Canadian Waste Services Holdings Inc.

Canadian Waste Services Inc.

Waste Management, Inc.

Intervenor(s):

Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

 

Hearing Date:

2001-06-20 to 2001-06-22

Hearing Location:

Ottawa

Panel Members:

McKeown J.

L.P. Schwartz

G. Solursh

 

Case Documents

 

Pleading(s)

 

 

Other(s)

 

#

Title

Date

8a

Request for leave to intervene on behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

2000-06-05

9a

Request for leave to intervene on behalf of Mark Thompson and Luciano Bet

2000-06-05

14a

Respondents' response to the request for leave to intervene by the Corporation of Chatham-Kent

2000-06-19

15a

Respondents' response to the request for leave to intervene by Mr. Mark Thompson and Mr. Luciano Bet

2000-06-19

17

Response of the Commissioner to the request for leave to intervene by the Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

2000-06-20

18

Response of the Commissioner to the request for leave to intervene of Messrs. Thompson and Bet

2000-06-20

33a

Agreed statement of facts (includes appendix C)

2000-11-15

54

Memorandum of argument re. Admissibility of expert report of M.R. Baye

2000-11-15

56a

Agreed statement of facts (supp)

2000-11-22

48a

Expert affidavit of G. Hay dated October 10, 2000

2000-11-22

49a

Expert rebuttal of G. Hay dated October 25, 2000

2000-11-22

45a

Expert rebuttal affidavit of M. Baye dated October 20, 2000

2000-11-24

69b

Expert Affidavit of C. Vellturo dated May 24, 2001

2001-06-14

76a

Expert rebuttal affidavit of C. Vellturo dated June 13, 2001

2001-06-21

 

Decision(s)

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.