Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

Competition Tribunal

Canada Coat of Arms / Armoiries du Canada

Tribunal de la Concurrence

Date: January 23, 2018

Subject: CT-2016-015 - Commissioner of Competition v Vancouver Airport Authority

Direction to Counsel (from Mr. Justice Gascon, Chairperson)

Further to the process that has been followed for the filing of expert reports, the Tribunal reminds counsel to adhere to the following instructions when filing documents (e.g., witness statements, submissions, documents, etc. but excluding invoices) that contain confidential information:

  1. Confidential Level A Version

The Confidential Level A version of a document shall highlight the Confidential Level A information in red and the Confidential Level B information in yellow. Each page of the Confidential Level A version of a document shall indicate in the top right-hand side: “CONFIDENTIAL LEVEL A”.

  1. Confidential B Version

The Confidential Level B version of a document shall highlight the Confidential Level B information in yellow and shall redact/black out the Confidential Level A information. The redacted/blacked out portions shall be proportional to the actual text that is being redacted. Each page of the Confidential Level B version of a document shall indicate in the top right-hand side: “CONFIDENTIAL LEVEL B”.

  1. Public Version

The Public version of a document shall redact/black out all Confidential Level A and B information. The redacted/blacked out portions shall be proportional to the actual text that is being redacted. Each page of the Public version of a document shall indicate in the top right-hand side: “PUBLIC”. There shall always be a public version of any document.

The Tribunal also reminds counsel that the Confidential Level A, Confidential Level B and Public versions of witness statements and submissions are to be filed with the Tribunal at the same time.

Bianca Zamor

Registry Officer

Competition Tribunal

600-90 Sparks, Ottawa ON K1P 5B4

Tel.: 613-941-2440

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.