Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

Competition Tribunal

Canada Coat of Arms / Armoiries du Canada

Tribunal de la Concurrence

Reference: The Commissioner of Competition v. The Toronto Real Estate Board, 2014 Comp. Trib. 3

File No.: CT-2011-003

Registry Document No.: 248

IN THE MATTER OF the Competition Act, R.S.C 1985, c. C-34, as amended;

AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Commissioner of Competition pursuant to section 79 of the Competition Act;

AND IN THE MATTER OF certain rules, policies and agreements relating to the residential multiple listing service of the Toronto Real Estate Board.

BETWEEN:

The Commissioner of Competition

(applicant)

and

The Toronto Real Estate Board

(respondent)

and

The Canadian Real Estate Association

(intervenor)

Competition Tribunal Seal / Sceau Tribunal de la Concurrence

Date of case management conference: 20140401

Presiding Judicial Member: Simpson J.

Date of Order: April 7, 2014

Order signed by: Madam Justice S. Simpson

SCHEDULING ORDER


[1]  UPON meeting with counsel for the Commissioner of Competition, the Toronto Real Estate Board and the Canadian Real Estate Association;

[2]  AND UPON being advised that all counsel are available for a hearing on the dates set out below for the reconsideration of the Commissioner’s application filed on May 27, 2011;

THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:

[3]  The hearing will commence at 9:30 am on Tuesday, October 14, 2014, in the Competition Tribunal hearing room at 600-90 Sparks Street, Ottawa, Ontario.

[4]  The hearing will continue on business days until Friday, October 24, 2014.

DATED at Ottawa, this 7th day of April, 2014.

SIGNED on behalf of the Tribunal by the presiding judicial member.

(s) Sandra J. Simpson


APPEARANCES:

For the applicant:

The Commissioner of Competition

John Rook

Emrys Davis

For the respondent:

The Toronto Real Estate Board

Donald Affleck, Q.C.

David Vaillancourt

Fiona Campbell

For the intervenor:

The Canadian Real Estate Association

Sandra A. Forbes

Jim Dinning

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.