Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

.. I ~

L THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF the Competition Act, R.S., 1985, c. C-34; AND IN THE MATTER OF an inquiry pursuant to subsection lO(l)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act relating to the marketing practices of Imperial Brush Co. Ltd. and Kel Kem Ltd. (c.o.b. as Imperial Manufacturing Group);

BETWEEN: ---------.. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMPETITION COMPETITION TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL DE LA CONCURRENCE

L ~~"~ 'l 2001 cyt ~ Applicant/Respondent E U D I REGISTRAR - REGISTRAIR T -and-OTTAWA, ON () Vb/ I ""-~.:..;;.;;.;;.;;.;:....;~....&.f,..w.;:~.wpERlAL BRUSH CO. LTD. AND KEL KEM LTD. (c.o.b. AS IMPERIAL MANUFACTURING GROUP)

Respondents/A pplicants

BOOK OF AUTHORITIES: CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION Volume 1of4

William J. Miller Stephane Lilkoff Roger Nassrallah c/o Department of Justice Counsel for the Commissioner of Competition Place du Portage, Phase I I 50 Victoria Street Hull, Quebec KIA OC9

c E CT-2006-10 lC

Case Volume·l R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 (CanLII) R. v. 671135 Ontario Ltd., (1994) 55 C.P.R. (3d) 204 (QL) R. v. Teixeira, (1986) 12 C.P.R. (3d) 263 R. v. Professional Technology of Canada Ltd., (1986)12 C.P.R. (3d) 218

R. v. Canadian Tire Corp., [1985] 0.J. No. 1990 (QL) RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada, [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199 (CanLII) R. v. Guignard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 472 (QL) Sauve v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), (2003) 168 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (QL)

Volume 2 Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825 9 (QL)

R. v. Bryan, 2007 SCC 12 (CanLII) Harper v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 827 (CanLII) Canada (Attorney General) v. JTI-Macdonald Corp., 2007 SCC 30 (CanLII)

Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Sears Canada Inc., (2005) 13 37 C.P.R. (4th) 65 (QL)

, 1 ! 1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8

10 11 12

Volume3 R. v. Sharpe, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45 (CanLII) R. v. Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 606 (QL) R. v. Wholesale Travel Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154 (QL) Volume4 Dagenais v. CBC, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 (CanLII) R. v. Zundel, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 (CanLII) Ford v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 712 (CanLII) I I

11 1 14 15 16 17 18 19

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.