Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

IN THE MATTER OF the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Commissioner of Competition for an Order Pursuant to section 92 of the Competition Act;

AND IN THE MATTER OF a joint venture between Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc. and James Richardson International Limited in respect of port terminal grain handling in the Port of Vancouver.

AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an interim consent order pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act,

BETWEEN: COMPETITION TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL DE LA CONCURRENCE if HE COMMISSIONER OF COMPETITION FILED I PRODUIT Applicant December 14, 2005 -AND-

J os LaRose for I pour

REGISTRAR/ REGISTRAIRE

#0009 SASKATCHEWAN WHEAT POOL INC. OTTAWA, ONT JAME S RICHARDSON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 6362681 CANADA LTD. AND 6362699 CANADA LTD. Respondents

CONSENT THE PARTIES hereto, by their solicitors, hereby irrevocably consent to the issuance of a consent interim order in the form attached as Schedule "A".

For the Applicant: Dated at, Gatineau, this tlv. day of December, 2005. ~.~···· ~haplan Mr. Andre Brantz

CT- 2005-009

trnu·uuK IVIU00 NU. jj4V ~. j Ms. Valerie Chenard Competition Law Division :Oepartrnentof Justice Place du Portage, 22nd floor 5 0 Victoria Street, Phase I Gatineau, Quebec KIA OC9

Fa.~: (819) 953-9267 Counsel for the Commi.csioncr of Competition For the R~pondents: Dated at, 1. Regina., Sask. ... :.this 13thday ofDecember, 2005.

Fax: (306) 347-8350 Counsel for Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc., 6362681 Canada Ltd. and 6362699 Canada Ltd

Dated at,------- this __ day of December, 2005. Mr. Robert S. Russell Mr. Adam Fanaki

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Scotia Plazn 40 King Street West

Toronto, Ontario MSG3Y4

Fax: (416) 36lw7060 Counsel for James Richardson International Limited.

2

DEC-14-2005 15:53 P.03/03 12/13/2005 15:49 FAX B1S 953 9267 CLO/SOC re @003/010 Ms. Valme Chenard Competition Law Division ])eparnuentgf1uitice Place cm Portage, 22nd floor 50 Victoria Street. Phase l Oatineau., Quebec KIA OC9 Fax: (819) 953-9267 Counsel for the Commissioner of Compecition

For Ule Re1poadenta: Dated at, _______ , this_ day of December, 2005.

Mr. Glen S. Lekach Mr. Peter T. Bergbusch Balfour Moss

700-2103 11th Ave Regina, Saskatchewan S4P4Gl

Fax: (306) 347-8350 Counsel for Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc., 6362681 Canada Ltd. and 6362699 Canada LUI.

Dated at, loron.+o , thio I 'tu, day of December, 2005. Mr. Robert S. Russell Mr. Adam Panaki

Borden Ladner Gervaii LLP Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M503Y4

Fax; (416) 361-7060 Connsel for Jam.ea Richardson Intmnational Limited.

2

TOTAL P.03

Schedule "A" CT- 2005-009 THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

IN THE MATTER OF the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Commissioner of Competition for an Order Pursuant to section 92 of the Competition Act;

AND IN THE MATTER OF a joint venture between Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc. and James Richardson International Limited in respect of port terminal grain handling in the Port of Vancouver.

AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an interim consent order pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act,

BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER OF COMPETITION Applicant

-AND-SASKATCHEWAN WHEAT POOL INC. JAMES RICHARDSON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 6362681 CANADA LTD. AND 6362699 CANADA LTD. Respondents

INTERIM CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc. and James Richardson International Limited, 6362681 Canada Ltd. and 6362699 Canada Ltd. (collectively, the "Respondents") have entered into a series of agreements dated April 6, 2005 creating a joint venture in connection with grain handling services and the operation of their respective port terminal grain handling terminals in the Port of Vancouver;

AND WHEREAS the Commissioner of Competition has made an application pursuant to sections 92 and 104 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, as amended;

- 2 -AND UPON READING the Notice of Application filed on November 10, 2005, the Applicant's Memorandum of Argument on Interim Relief, the Draft Interim Consent Order, the Affidavit of Denis Corriveau dated November 10, 2005, and the Consent of the parties, filed herein;

AND UPON DETERMINING that this is an appropriate case for the issuance of an interim consent order pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act;

AND UPON CONSIDERING that the Commissioner and the Respondents have reached an agreement which is reflected in this interim order;

AND IT BEING UNDERSTOOD that the Commissioner has alleged certain material facts, and that, although the Respondents do not agree with all the facts alleged by the Commissioner, the Respondents do not contest the facts as stated in the Affidavit of Denis Corriveau for the purpose of this application for a consent interim order only;

THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT: I. DEFINITIONS 1. For the purposes of this Order, the following capitalized terms have the following meanmg:

(a) "Act" means the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, as amended; (b) "Affiliate" has the meaning given to it in subsection 2(2) of the Act; (c) "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of Competition appointed pursuant to section 7 of the Act;

( d) "Hold Separate Monitor" means the Person appointed pursuant to Part IV of the Order, and any employees, agents or other persons acting for or on behalf of the Hold Separate Monitor;

(e) "JRI" means James Richardson International Limited, a corporation existing under the laws of Canada, its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups, and affiliates;

(f) "Joint Venture" means the joint venture between the Respondents as reflected in their agreements dated April 6, 2005, for the joint operation and marketing of their Vancouver port terminal facilities;

(g) "JV Operator" means 6362699 Canada Ltd. and 6362681 Canada Ltd.; (h) "Restricted Marketing Activities" means setting, quoting, negotiating or agreeing to prices, rates, rebates, allowances, diversion premiums, tariffs

- 3 ­and terms for grain handling services, but does not include other sales, promotional or marketing activities;

(i) "Restricted Marketing Information" includes information with respect to pricing, rates, rebates, allowances, diversion premiums, and tariffs for grain handling services, but does not include information with respect to other sales, promotional or marketing activities, or any information which is required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to regulatory requirements;

(j) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, corporation, association, trust, unincorporated organization or other entity;

(k) "SWP" means Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc., a corporation ex1stmg under the laws of Canada, its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups and affiliates;

(1) "Tribunal' means the Competition Tribunal established by the Competition Tribunal Act (Canada), R.S. 1985, c. 19 (2nd Supp.), as amended.

II APPLICATION 2. The provisions of this Order apply to: (a) JRI; (b) SWP; (c) 6362681 Canada Ltd.; (d) 6362699 Canada Ltd.; (e) all other Persons acting in concert or participating with (a) to (d), above with respect to the matters referred to in this Order, who shall have received actual notice of this Order;

(f) the Commissioner; and (g) the Hold Separate Monitor. III. HOLD SEPARATE 3. SWP, JRI and the JV Operator shall not, during the term of this Order jointly engage in Restricted Marketing Activities in respect of grain handling services at the Port of Vancouver.

- 4 -4. The Respondents shall not disclose any Restricted Marketing Information to any other Respondent during the term of this Order.

5. SWP and JRI shall, during the term of this Order: (a) maintain and hold such physical assets, including computer systems and databases used in connection with any Restricted Marketing Activities in good condition and repair, normal wear and tear excepted, and to standards at least equal to those maintained prior to the date of this Order; and

(b) take all commercially reasonable steps to maintain quality and service standards for the supply of grain handling services at the Port of Vancouver at the level that existed prior to the date of this Order, save as required by prudent management of such;

6. SWP shall not offer employment to employees of JRI employed, directly or indirectly in Restricted Marketing Activities. The foregoing shall apply mutatis mutandis to JRI.

IV. MONITOR 7. Following the issuance of this Order, the Commissioner shall appoint a Hold Separate Monitor. The choice of Hold Separate Monitor shall be subject to the consent of JRI and SWP, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Hold Separate Monitor shall be responsible for monitoring the compliance of the Respondents with this Order, pending the Tribunal's final determination on the merits of the Commissioner's Application pursuant to section 92 of the Act.

8. If the Hold Separate Monitor ceases to act or fails to act diligently and consistent with the purposes of this Order or if he/she is unable to perform his/her duties under the terms of this Order because of death, disability, termination for cause or any other reasons, the Commissioner may appoint a new Hold Separate Monitor within 15 days, subject to the consent of JRI and SWP, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Order shall apply to any substitute Hold Separate Monitor appointed pursuant to this paragraph.

9. SWP and JRI shall be jointly responsible for all fees or expenses reasonably and properly charged or incurred by the Hold Separate Monitor, or any substitute thereof appointed pursuant to this Order, in connection with the execution or performance of the Hold Separate Monitor's duties under this Order.

10. The Hold Separate Monitor shall have full and complete access to all personnel, books, records, documents and facilities of the Respondents that pertain, directly or indirectly to the negotiation of agreements for the supply of port terminal grain handling services at the Port of Vancouver. The Respondents shall cooperate with any reasonable request of the Hold Separate Monitor. The Respondents shall not take any action to

- 5 ­interfere with or impede the Hold Separate Monitor's ability to discharge his/her duties and responsibilities.

11. The Hold Separate Monitor shall serve without bond or other security, on such reasonable and customary terms and conditions as are agreed, with the approval of the Commissioner. The Hold Separate Monitor shall have the authority to employ, at the cost and expense of SWP and JRI such persons as are reasonably necessary to carry out the Hold Separate Monitor's duties and responsibilities under this Order. The Hold Separate Monitor shall account for all expenses incurred, including fees for his/her services, and such account shall be subject to the approval of the Commissioner.

12. SWP and JRI shall indemnify the Hold Separate Monitor and hold him/her harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses arising out of, or in connection with, the performance of the duties of the Hold Separate Monitor, including all reasonable fees of counsel and other expenses incurred in connection with the preparation for, or defense of any claim, whether or not resulting in any liability, except to the extent that such liabilities, losses, damages, claims, or expenses result from misfeasance, gross negligence, willful or wanton acts, or bad faith by the Hold Separate Monitor.

13. The Hold Separate Monitor shall report in writing to the Commissioner: (i) every 60 days after being appointed until this Order is terminated; and (ii) at any other time as requested by the Commissioner or her staff, concerning the Respondents' compliance with this Order.

14. The Respondents shall not exert or attempt to exert any influence, direction or control over the Hold Separate Monitor, which may adversely affect the discharge of the Hold Separate Monitor's duties under the terms of this Order.

15. This Order shall not be construed as providing the Hold Separate Monitor with ownership, management, possession, charge or control of the Respondents.

16. The Hold Separate Monitor shall execute a confidentiality agreement with the Respondents in which the Hold Separate Monitor will undertake not to disclose any competitively sensitive or proprietary information acquired in the performance of the Hold Separate Monitor's duties to any person except to the Commissioner.

17. If the Hold Separate Monitor considers that SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator are in default of any of the terms of this Order, he shall immediately notify the Commissioner of the breach, who shall forthwith give notice to SWP and JRI setting out the particulars of such default.

18. If the Hold Separate Monitor advises the Commissioner that SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator are in default of any of the terms of this Order, or if the Commissioner otherwise believes such to be the case, then for the purpose of determining or securing compliance with this Order, subject to any valid claim to a legally recognized privilege, and upon written request, SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator shall permit any duly authorized representative of the Commissioner:

- 6 -(a) upon a minimum of 7 days notice to SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator, access during office hours of SWP and/or JRI, to inspect and copy all books, ledgers, accounts, correspondence, memorandum, and other records and control of SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator relating to compliance with this Order; and

(b) upon a minimum of 10 days notice of SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator, and without restraint or interference from SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator, to interview directors, officers or employees of SWP, JRI. and/or the JV Operator on matters in the possession or under the control of SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator relating to compliance with this Order.

V. NOTIFICATION 19. Each of SWP, JRI, 6362681 Canada Ltd. and 6362699 Canada Ltd. shall provide a copy of this Order to each of their officers, employees, or agents having managerial responsibility for any obligations under this Order, no later than 5 days from the date this Order has been registered with the Tribunal.

20. Notices, reports and other communications required or permitted pursuant to any of the terms of this Order, shall be in writing and shall be considered to be given if dispatched by personal delivery, registered mail or facsimile transmission to the parties:

(a) If to the Commissioner: Mr. Jonathan Chaplan Mr. Andre Brantz Ms. Valerie Chenard Competition Law Division Department of Justice Place du Portage, 22nd floor 50 Victoria Street, Phase I Gatineau, Quebec KIA OC9

Fax: (819) 953-9267 (b) If to SWP, 6362681 Canada Ltd. or 6362699 Canada Ltd.: Mr. Glen S. Lekach Mr. Peter T. Bergbusch Balfour Moss 700-2103 11th Ave Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 4Gl

Fax: (306) 347-8350

- 7 -(c) Ifto JRI: Mr. Robert S. Russell Mr. Adam Fanaki Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5G3Y4

Fax: (416) 361-7060 VI. GENERAL 21. SWP and JRI agree that they will take such steps as are necessary to ensure that 6362681 Canada Ltd. and 6362699 Canada Ltd., which are wholly-owned by SWP and JRI, take such measures, including adopting any necessary resolutions or obtaining any necessary authorizations, to ensure they are be bound by the terms of this Order.

22. This Order shall remain in effect until the Tribunal's final determination on the merits of the Commissioner's Application pursuant to section 92 of the Act.

23. In the event of a dispute as to the interpretation or application of this Order, including any decision by the Commissioner pursuant to this Order or breach of this Order by the Respondents, the Commissioner, SWP, JRI and/or the JV Operator shall be at liberty to apply to the Tribunal for an interpretation of the provisions of this Order or to address any issue concerning this Order.

24. This Order does not prohibit anyone from providing confidential information to the Commissioner for purposes of the administration or enforcement of the Act, including for the purposes of this proceeding.

25. For greater certainty, nothing in this Order shall prevent the disclosure of confidential information to counsel for the Respondents in connection with the defence of any application that may be made by the Commissioner under the Act or any matters at issue by reason of this Order.

DATED at this day of December, 2005. Signed on behalf of the Tribunal by the presiding judicial member.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.