Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

Competition Tribunal

Canada Coat of Arms / Armoiries du Canada

Tribunal de la concurrence

Citation: Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v Secure Energy Services Inc. and Tervita Corporation , 20 21 Comp Trib 5

File No.: CT- 2021-002

Registry Document No.: 19

IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Commissioner of Competition made pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34;

BETWEEN:

Commissioner of Competition

(applicant)

and

Secure Energy Services Inc

Tervita Corporation

(respondents)

Competition Tribunal Seal

Date of conference call : July 6, 2021

Before Judicial Member: J. Gagné

Date of order: July 7, 2021

SCHEDULING ORDER

[1] FURTHER TO the Application filed by the Commissioner of Competition on June 29, 2021, against the Respondents Secure Energy Services Inc. and Tervita Corporation, pursuant to section 104 of the Competition Act;

[2] AND FURTHER TO the proposed timetables submitted by the parties and to the discussions with counsel for both parties at a case management conference call held on July 6, 2021;

THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:

[3] The schedule for the steps to be completed in connection with the Application shall be as follows:

Respondents’ response and responding application record: July 14, 2021

Applicant’s reply (if any): July 19, 2021

Cross-examinations: July 20-22, 2021

Applicant’s memorandum of fact and law: July 26, 2021

Respondents’ memorandum of fact and law: July 28, 2021

Case management conference (if requested by a party): July 28, 2021

Hearing of the Application: August 4, 2021, starting at 10 a.m.

DATED at St-Sauveur , this 7th day of July 2021

SIGNED on behalf of the Tribunal by the presiding judicial member .

(s) Jocelyne Gagné


COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For the applicant:

Commissioner of Competition

Jonathan Hood

Paul Klippenstein

Ellé Nekiar

Andrew Kelly

 

For the respondent:

Secure Energy Services Inc.

Rob Kwinter

Brian Facey

Joe McGrade

Nicole Henderson

 

For the respondent:

Tervita Corporation

Melanie Aitken

Emrys Davis

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.