Case Documents

Decision Information

Decision Content

B E T W E E N:

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

COMMISSIONER OF COMPETITION

Court File No. CT-2022-002

Applicant

- and -

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. and SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC. Respondents

- and -

VIDEOTRON LTD.

Intervenor

AFFIDAVIT OF ELIZABETH FIMIO Affirmed July 17, 2023

I, ELIZABETH FIMIO, of the City of Burlington, in the Regional Municipality of Halton, AFFIRM:

1. I am a law clerk at the law firm of Bennett Jones LLP ("Bennett Jones"), lawyers for the intervenor Videotron Ltd. ("Videotron"). As such, I have personal knowledge of the facts set out in this affidavit, except where I indicate herein that my knowledge is based on information provided to me by others or from reviewing a document, in which case I state the source of the information. In all such instances, I believe the information to be true.

2. I affirm this Affidavit in support of Videotron's Bill of Costs dated December 29, 2022 ("Bill of Costs"), which was prepared by me in this matter and is attached as Exhibit "A", to establish the disbursements and taxes incurred by Videotron in these proceedings.

3.

Pursuant to the Bill of Costs, Videotron is claiming $103,122.50, as follows:

(a)

Disbursements in the amount of $91,989.41; and

(b) HST on disbursements in the amount of $11.133.09. 4. These amounts are slightly lower than Videotron's actual disbursements because: (i) of minor calculation errors when totaling amounts and (ii) a minor typo resulted in a slightly lower claim for corn ier costs in the Bill of Costs. Regardless, Videotron is only claiming for the amount reflected in its Bill of Costs.

5. For pinposes of preparing the Bill of Costs and this Affidavit, I relied on the accounting records and files maintained by the film with respect to this matter.

6. All disbursements and taxes being claimed in the Bill of Costs were billed to Videotron by Bennett Jones with the exception of the e-discovery (database hosting) fees, which were billed directly to Videotron or an affiliate thereof. These disbursements are reflected in Bennett Jones' invoices to Videotron.

PRINTING AND PHOTOCOPIES

7. Videotron incurred disbursements in the aggregate amount of $22,816.75 from printing and copying by Bennett Jones with respect to this application as reflected in the table below, but owing to a minor calculation error these costs were listed as $22,849.60 in the Bill of Costs.

Description of Service Printing Colom Printing (including large documents) Photocopying Colom Photocopying (including large documents)

8.

Amount (exclusive of taxes) $9,917.00 $12,243.00 $335.75 $321.00

Bennett Jones charged the following amounts for its printing and copying services:

(a) (b)

Printing - $0.25 per page Colom Printing - $0.50 per page.

9.

(c) Photocopying - $0.25 per page. (d) Colour Photocopying - $0.50 per page. The printed and photocopied documents included, but are not limited to:

(a)

(b)

Printed copies of Videotron's materials as requested by the Competition Tribunal; and

Copies of the parties' witness statements, expert reports, mediation materials, closing materials and other materials for use during the hearing.

10. The large charge for colour printing reflects the large number of exhibits that it was necessary to produce in colour (e.g., presentations) and the need to use colour to indicate levels of confidentiality (i.e., red for Confidential Level A, yellow for Confidential Level B).

COURIER CHARGES

11. Videotron incurred courier charges of $666.55 related to the delivery of Videotron's materials to Chief Justice Crampton. Attached as Exhibit "B" are the invoices in support of the disbursement for courier charges (partially redacted to exclude privileged information relating to other files).

12. However, owing to a typographical error in the Bill of Costs, Videotron only claimed $66.55 rather than $666.55. Although Videotron actually incurred costs of $666.55, it is only seeking $66.55 consistent with its Bill of Costs.

ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH AND GOVERNMENT SEARCHES

13. My review of the firm's invoices to Videotron indicates that $34.00 in legal research costs were incurred with respect to this matter in connection with a request to the Federal Court of Appeal registry to provide copies of three documents in connection with a relevant case. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "C" are the receipts for the legal research costs.

COURT REPORTER/TRANSCRIPT FEES

14. Videotron incurred disbursements in the aggregate amount of $42,431.00 in connection with the court reporter and translation services provided by StenoTran Services Inc.

Service Date Week one of Competition (November 7-10, 2022)

Week two of Competition (November 14-18, 2022)

Tribunal

Tribunal

hearing

hearing

Week three of Competition Tribunal healing (November 21-25, 2022)

Week four of Competition Tribunal (November 28-December 2, 2022)

Week five of Competition (December 13-14, 2022)

Tribunal

hearing

hearing

Invoice Number W-001891

W-001902

W-001909

W-001926

W-001931

Amount $8,132.00

$10,354.00

$10,949.00

$8,853.00

$4,143.00

15. Each of StenoTran Services Inc.'s invoices sets out the quantity and unit cost of the services provided. Attached as Exhibit "D" are copies of the invoices provided by StenoTran Services Inc. in connection with the coin! reporting and translation services provided.

TRAVEL

16. My review of the firm's accounting records indicate that Videotron incurred disbursements in the aggregate amount of $6,350.25, in respect of expenses relating to travel, as follows:

Date

09/07/2022

09/07/2022

Counsel

Davis. Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Description

Westin Montreal

Beck Taxi

Hotel

Amount

CAD $766.34

CAD $22.00

Amount charged client (excluding GST)

CAD $733.02

to

CAD $19.93

Reason

Attending discoveiy with witness

Attending discoveiy with witness

09/07/2022

09/09/2022

09/09/2022

09/20/2022

10/25/2022

10/26/2022

10/26/2022

10/26/2022

10/26/2022

10/26/2022

10/26/2022

10/27/2022

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Rook, John

Rook, John

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Rook, John

Rook, John

Unipayment SVCLimo Taxi

Montreal Service

Ambassador Taxi

CAD $50.00

taxi CAD $52.30

Porter Airlines

Porter Airline

Porter Airlines

CAD $40.80

CAD $1,038.31

USD $487.00 (CAD 666.99)

CAD $1,150.62

Ottawa Marriott CAD $382 Hotel

Courtyard by CAD $399.23 Marriott Ottawa

Blue Line Taxi CAD $37.49 Ottawa

Blue Line Taxi

CAD $8.53

Marriott Ottawa CAD $59.78 Spin Kitchen & Bar

Blue Line Taxi CAD $38.53 Ottawa

CAD $48.17

CAD $50.46

CAD $36.89

CAD $983.63

$666.99

CAD $1,018.25

CAD $341.58

CAD $356.10

CAD $33.74

CAD $7.55

CAD $53.80

CAD $34.68

Attending discovery with witness

Attending discovery with witness

Attending discovery with witness

Attending discovery with witness

Attending discovery with witness

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

10/27/2022

10/27/2022

11/14/2022

11/16/2022

11/16/2022

11/18/2022

11/18/2022

11/18/2022

12/14/2022

12/14/2022

Davis, Emrys

Rook, John

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Davis, Emrys

Pannu, Alysha

Pannu, Alysha

Capital Taxi

Angelo Service

Air Canada

CAD $23.65

Taxi CAD $42.55

Ambassador Taxi

CAD $1073.34

CAD $20.00

Services De CAD $64.86 Transportation Trust

AC Hotels by CAD $779.74 Marriott Montreal

Hypra Quebec

Beck Taxi

A4U Taxi

Uber

Taxi CAD $57.11

CAD $32.10

CAD $31.75

CAD $13.59

CAD $21.47

CAD $38.29

CAD $952.74

CAD $18.33

CAD $62.29

CAD $747.61

CAD $55.01

CAD $29.02

CAD $28.67

CAD $12.03

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending mediation in Ottawa

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

Attending witness testimony in Montreal

File related to travel in Toronto

File related to travel in Toronto

17. Collectively attached as Exhibit "E" are copies of the invoices and receipts for travel expenses listed in paragraph 16 in support of the $6,350.25 disbursement for travel.

E-DISCOVERY (DATABASE HOSTING)

18. I understand, based on my review of invoices issued by Epiq Systems Canada ULC ("Epiq") directly to Videotron, that Videotron incurred costs in the aggregate amount of $47,806.66 in connection with the e-discovery, database hosting services provided by Epiq. With respect to hosting the document database, Epiq charges a monthly fee of $10 per gigabyte of data per month for a total of approximately 165 gigabytes of data by the end of the trial. Videotron also incurred fees from Epiq for project management services, including processing the documents, and consulting.

19. The disbursement amount is higher than the amount claimed in Videotron's original bill of costs by $4,699.05 as Epiq's November and December 2022 invoices had not been issued at the time that Videotron delivered its Bill of Costs. Attached as Exhibit "F" are copies of the invoices (partially redacted for privilege) provided by Epiq in connection with the e-discovery and database hosting services.

20. Although Videotron incurred total e-discovery costs of $47,806.66, it is only claiming $43,107.61 as reflected on its Bill of Costs.

HST ON DISBURSEMENTS

21. Videotron is seeking $11,133.09 for HST incurred in respect of the disbursements as reflected in its Bill of Costs. For the reasons described above, this is less than the actual HST incurred.

SWORN Remotely by Elizabeth Fimio of the City of Burlington, in the Regional Municipality of Halton, before me at the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, on July 17, 2023 in accordance with O. Reg. 431/20, Administering Oath or Declaration Remotely.

Commissioner for Taking Affidavits (or as may be)

ELIZABETH FIMIO

Kolding Larson (LSO#85542G)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.