Documentation

Informations sur la décision

Contenu de la décision

Attention : ce document est disponible en anglais seulement.

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL CT-2006-009 IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Director of Investigation and Research under section 79 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-34, as amended;

AND IN THE MATTER OF certain practices by Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd. in the communities of Cowichan Valley Regional District, Nanaimo Regional District and the District of Campbell River, British Columbia;

AND IN THE MATTER OF the order made by the Competition Tribunal on February 11, 1992;

AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Waste Management of Canada Corporation under section 106(1 )(a) of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-34, as amended, to rescind on consent the order made by the Competition Tribunal on February 11, 1992.

BETWEEN: COMPETITION TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL DE LA CONCURRENCE V' aste Management of Canada Corporation FILED I PRODUIT (formerly Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd.) September 7, 2006 CT-2006-009

Jos LaRose for I pour REGISTRAR/ REGISTRAIRE AppliGant OTTAWA, ONT #0002 - and -The Commissioner of Competition (formerly the Director of Investigation and Research)

Respondent

STATEMENT OF GROUNDS AND MATERIAL FACTS

- 2 -

I. STATEMENT OF GROUNDS 1. As described below, there have been a number of material changes in the relevant markets in the 14 years since February 11, 1992, when the Competition Tribunal made its order in this case (the "Order"). 2. The terms "Product" and "Markets" as used in this Statement of Grounds and Material Facts have the same meanings as in the Order. 3. In particular, the Applicant no longer "substantially or completely controls, throughout Canada or any area thereof, a class or species of business" as required for the purposes of making an order under section 79 of the Competition Act (the "Act") in that: (a) numerous competitors have entered and/or expanded in the relevant markets, fundamentally changing the structure of those markets; (b) the Applicant has substantially lower market shares in the relevant markets; and (c ) entry and expansion is now relatively easy in the three relevant markets.

4. Lower market shares combined with low barriers to entry in the relevant markets mean that the Applicant lacks the degree of market power required under section 79( 1) (a) of the Act. 5. In the circumstances that obtain today, the Order would not be made against the Applicant.

- 3 -

6. Following a careful review, the Commissioner of Competition (the "Commissioner") has consented to the rescission of the Order. 11. MATERIAL FACTS 7 The Applicant sets out below the following material facts as the basis for this application. While the Commissioner does not necessarily agree with all of the facts contained in this Statement of Grounds and Material Facts, the Commissioner does not contest them for the purpose of this application or any proceeding relating to this application. However, on balance, Commissioner agrees that sufficient changes of circumstances exist to warrant the order sought. A. THE PARTIES 8. The Commissioner is the authorized official appointed under section 7 of the Act and is charged with administration and enforcement of the Act. At the time of the Order, the position of the Commissioner was known as the Director of Investigation and Research. 9. The Applicant, Waste Management of Canada Corporation, is a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of Canada. In March 1997, Canadian Waste Services Inc. ("CWS"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Waste Services, Inc., acquired all of the assets of Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd. In 1998, USA Waste Services, Inc. merged with Waste Management, Inc. and continued its operation::> as Waste Management, Inc. The Applicant is an indirect wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc.

- 4 -8. THE RELEVANT BUSINESS 1o . In the 14 years since the Order was issued, there have been signifi.::;ant changes in the relevant markets. Specifically, there has been significant entry by new competitors as well as expansion by existing competitors supplying the Product in the Markets. 11. As a result of this new entry and expansion, the Applicant's market share in the supply of the Product has dropped significantly from approximately 90% (as found by the Tribunal in the Order) to less than 45% currently in each of the Markets. 12. An order pursuant to section 79 of the Act can only be made if the party "substantially or completely controls, throughout Canada or any area thereof, a class or species of business". The Tribunal has determined that this provision requires the party to have market power in a relevant market. High market shares and barriers to entry lead to a finding of market power. 13. Given that the Applicant's market share is now less than 45% in each of the Markets, and given the obvious case of entry and expansion in each of the Markets, the Applicant no longer possesses the requisite degree of market power to makB an order under section 79. 14. Further material facts relating to the Applicant's change of circumstances in the Markets are set out in more detail in the Affidavit of James T. Duncan sworn August 21, 2006 attached as Schedule "B" to the Notice of Application.

- 5 -

Ill RELIEF SOUGHT 15. The Applicant requests that the Order be rescinded in accordance with the terms of the Draft Order attached to the Notice of Application as Schedule "C" and to which the parties have consented. DATED at Toronto, this 23rd day of August, 2006.

Chris Hersh Yana Ermak Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3C2

Phone: 416.860.6513 Fax: 416.642.7168 Counsel for the Applicant

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL CT-91/2

IN THE MATTER OF an application by the Director of lnvesti9ation and Research under section 79 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-34, as amended;

AND IN THE MATTER OF certain practices by Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd. in the communities of Cowichan Valley Regional District, Nanaimo Regional District and the District of Campbell River, British Columbia;

AND IN THE MATTER OF the order made by the Competition Tribunal on February 11, 1992;

AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Waste Management of Canada Corporation under section 106(1 )(a) of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-34, as amended, to vary on consent the order made by the Competition Tribunal on February 11, 1992;

BETWEEN: Waste Management of Canada Corporation (formerly Laidlaw Waste Systems Ltd.)

Applicant and

(formerly the Director of Investigation and Research)

Respondent

STATEMENT OF GROUNDS AND MATERIAL FACTS Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 3C2

Mark J. Nicholson - Law Society No. 30801 G Phone: 416.860.6513 Fax: 416.642.7168 Chris Hersh - Law Society No. 43080N Phone: 416.869.5387 Fax: 416.640.3017 Yana Ermak- Law Society No. 47791A Phone: 416.860.2957 Fax: 416.640.3190 Counsel for the Applicant

The Commissioner of Competition

 Vous allez être redirigé vers la version la plus récente de la loi, qui peut ne pas être la version considérée au moment où le jugement a été rendu.