I ,/1 / ( -1 (
CT-89/j THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF an Application by the Director of Investigation and Research under sections 92 and 105 of the Competition Act, R.S.C., 1985, c.C-34, as amended;
AND IN THE MATTER OF the acq . si timMPET!TIGH TRIBUNAL by Imperial Oil Limited of t shares of Texaco Canada Inc. BETWEEN THE DIRECTOR OF INVESTIGATIO AND RESEARCH
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL DE LA CONCUHRENCE Applicant File No. t!.. T - j 'I/ _3 - and -No. dt1 dossier -:----JD.u_,_~ v ~ IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED er Exhibit No 9 -~ Respondent No. de la pic·::e -·-----·---
Filed on /Jd;.1i/fr: I~~ - and -Deposee le J ~ r / Registrar /""': fi~ ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC Greltier ;r--Intervenor
SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM T. STANBURY
I, William T. Stanbury, of the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia in Canada MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS:
1. I am the UPS Foundation Professor of Regulation and Competition Policy in the Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration in the University of British Columbia and have been retained by the Director of Investigation and Research, Consumer and Corporate Affairs - Canada, to provide my
T!?"Bt.INAl Of LA COHCURR~NCE P ~ . A~~ 18 1989 !&f 3 ' D ' ' r i
- 2 opinion on effects on competition in the Atlantic region resulting from the merger of Imperial Oil Limited with Texaco Canada Inc., and on the efficacy of the Draft Consent Order submitted to the Competition Tribunal.
2. This affidavit is supplementary to my affidavit dated the 20th day of July, 1989, and is intended to clarify certain points contained in Exhibit "A" of that affidavit. This affidavit does not affect the conclusions set out in my earlier affidavit.
3. With regard to paragraph 14(a) on page 4 of Exhibit "A", I now understand that Shell has one terminal in the Atlantic region.
4. With regard to paragraph 27 on page 9 of Exhibit "A", the figure of 4.3 cents/litre in Nova Scotia should read 4.6 cents/litre.
5. With regard to Table 3 on page 13 of Exhibit"A", the source of information consisted of company submissions as well as National Energy Board data.
- 3 -6. I make this affidavit pursuant to Rule 42(1) of the Competition Tribunal Rules.
SWORN before me at the City of Hull, in the Province of Quebec, this ~day of August, 1989.
&~ ------